Реляционная амбивалентность: исследуя социальные и дискурсивные измерения амбивалентности Случай стареющих трудовых мигрантов из Турции
Аннотация
Многие трудовые мигранты в Вене, прибывшие в Австрию в качестве так называемых гастарбайтеров вместе со своими супругами, лелеяли мечту вернуться в страну исхода, самое позднее после выхода на пенсию. К тому времени, однако, возвращение стало не столь очевидным, что вызывало
неоднозначность в вопросах принадлежности/возвращения, транснациональной мобильности и ухода за пожилыми людьми. Основываясь на обширном материале данных, собранных качественными методами,
в этой статье я показываю, что амбивалентность обнаруживается в сложности нарративов мигрантов, особенно в том, как они 1) переоценивают выбор в прошлом, 2) обсуждают чувства принадлежности и 3) оценивают будущие варианты в контексте старости и ухода за пожилыми людьми. Я утверждаю, что социальное измерение амбивалентности, которое я называю «реляционной амбивалентностью», имеет решающее значение для понимания опыта, размышлений и выбора трудовых мигрантов. Анализ показывает, что амбивалентность следует понимать как продукт взаимоотношений, а не только как индивидуальный опыт. Концепт реляционной амбивалентности охватывает эти социальные и дискурсивные измерения амбивалентности. Итогом статьи является выявление партикулярности амбивалентности как в общем контексте миграции, так и в конкретном контексте трудовых мигрантов Вены, принимая во внимание как
чувства неоднозначности, так и одновременность различных, противоположных позиций в одном и том же человеке как проявления сущности человеческого опыта.
Ключевые слова
Полный текст:
Без имениЛитература
Abu-Lughod, L., Lutz, C. A. (1990). Introduction: Emotion, discourse, and the politics of everyday life. In: Abu-Lughod, L. and Lutz, C.A. (eds). Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–23.
Ahmed, S. (1999). Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(3), 329–347.
Baldassar, L., Gabaccia, D. R. (2011). Intimacy and Italian Migration: Gender and Domestic Lives in a Mobile World. New York: Fordham University Press.
Bauman, Z. (1990). Modernity and ambivalence. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2–3), 143–169.
Baykara-Krumme, H. (2014). Returning, staying, or both? Mobility patterns among elderly Turkish migrants after retirement. Transnational Social Review, 3(1), 11–29.
Berliner, D. (2016). Anthropology and the study of contradictions. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 1–6.
Bilecen, B. (2017). Home-making practices and social protection: An example of Turkish migrants living in Germany. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 32, 77–90.
Bilecen, B., Catir, G., Orhon, A. (2015). Turkish-German transnational social space: Stitching across borders. Population, Space and Place, 21, 244–256.
Boccagni, P. (2012). Rethinking transnational studies: Transnational ties and the transnationalism of everyday life. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 117–132.
Boccagni, P. (2017). Migration and the Search for Home. Mapping Domestic Space in Migrants’ Everyday Lives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boccagni, P., Baldassar, L. (2015). Emotions on the move: Mapping the emerging fields of emotion and migration. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 73–80.
Bolzman, C., Kaeser, L., Christe, E. (2017). Transnational mobilities as a way of life among older migrants from Southern Europe. Population, Space and Place, 23(5), 73–80.
Bolzman, C., Fibbi, R., Vial, M. (2006). What to do after retirement? Elderly migrants and the question of return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(8), 1359–1375.
Boyer, D (2006). Ostalgie and the politics of the future in Eastern Europe. Public Culture, 18(2), 361–382.
Ciubanu, O., Nedelcu, M. (2019). Ageing as a Migrant: Vulnerabilities, Agency and Policy Implications. London; New York: Routledge.
Cohen, L. (1994). Old age: Cultural and critical perspectives. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 137–158.
Connidis, I., McMullin, J. (2002). Sociological ambivalence and family ties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(3), 558–567.
Dwyer, C. (2000). Negotiating diasporic identities: Young British South Asian Muslim women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23(4), 475–486.
Ehrkamp, P. (2005). Placing identities: Transnational practices and local attachments of Turkish immigrants in Germany, 31(2), 345–364.
Ganga, D. (2006). From potential returnees into settlers: Nottingham’s older Italians. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(8), 1395–1413.
Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. Beck U, Giddens A and Lash S (eds). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 56–109.
Glick Schiller, N., Caglar, A. (2011). Locating Migration: Rescaling Cities and Migrants. Ithaca. N.Y.; London: Cornell University Press.
Glick Schiller, N., Salazar, N. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200.
Hague, G. (2016). Questions concerning a future-politics. History and Anthropology, 27(4), 465–467.
Hillcoat-Nalletamby, S., Philipps, J. E. (2011). Sociological ambivalence revisited. Sociology, 45(2), 202–217.
Hirsch, M., Spitzer, L. (2002). We would not have come without you: Generations of nostalgia. American Imago, 59(3), 253–276.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hochschild, A. (1997). The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan.
Hromadzic, A., Palmberger, M. (2018). Care across Distance: Ethnographic Explorations of Aging and Migration. Oxford and Brooklyn, NY: Berghahn Books.
Jovanovic, D. (2016). Ambivalence and the study of contradictions. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 1–6.
Karl, U., Torres, S. (eds) (2016). Ageing in Contexts of Migration. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Keith, J. (1980). “The best is yet to be.” Toward an anthropology of age. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 339–364.
Kelle, U. (2007). The development of categories: Different approaches in grounded theory. In Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (eds). The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 191–213.
Kierans, C., Bell, K. (2017). Cultivating ambivalence. Some methodological considerations for anthropology. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 23–44.
King, R., Dalipaj, M., Mai, N. (2006). Gendering migration and remittances: Evidence from London and Northern Albania. Population, Space and Place, 12(6), 409–434.
Kivisto, P., La Vecchia-Mikkola, V. (2013). Immigrant ambivalence toward the homeland: The case of Iraqis in Helsinki and Rome. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 11(2), 198–216.
Lambek, M. (2016). On contradictions. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 6–8.
Leavitt, J. (1996). Meaning and feeling in the anthropology of emotions. American Ethnologist, 23(3), 514–539.
Maynard, M. A., Afsher, H., Franks, M., et al. (2008). Women in Later Life: Exploring Race and Ethnicity. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Merton, R. K. (1976). Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: Free Press.
Palmberger, M. (2008). Nostalgia matters: Nostalgia for Yugoslavia as potential vision for a better future. Sociologija, 50(4), 355–370.
Palmberger, M. (2016). Social ties and embeddedness in old age: Older labour migrants in Vienna. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(2), 235–249.
Palmberger, M. (2018). Social embeddedness and care among Turkish labor migrants in Vienna: The role of migrant associations. In: Hromadzic, A. and Palmberger, M. (eds). Care across Distance: Ethnographic Explorations of Aging and Migration. Oxford and Brooklyn, N.Y.: Berghahn, 97–112.
Palmberger, M., Gingrich, A. (2013). Qualitative comparative practices: Dimensions, cases, and strategies. In: Flick U (ed.). Sage Handbook of Analyzing Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 94–108.
Palmberger, M., Hromadzic, A. (2018). Introduction: Care across distance. In: Hromadzic, A. and Palmberger, M. (eds). Care across Distance: Ethnographic Explorations of Aging and Migration. Oxford and Brooklyn, N.Y.: Berghahn, 1–12.
Peletz, M. (2001). Ambivalence in kinship since the 1940s. In: Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S. (eds). Relative Value. Durham: Duke University Press, 413–442.
Reinprecht, C. (2006). Nach Der Gastarbeit: Prekäres Altern in Der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Vienna: Braumüller.
Smart, B. (1999). Facing Modernity: Ambivalence, Reflexivity and Morality. London: SAGE.
Smelser, N. J. (1998). The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 1–16.
Uehling, G. (2002). Sitting on suitcases: Ambivalence and ambiguity in the migration intentions of Crimean Tatar women. Journal of Refugee Studies, 15(4), 388–408.
Vertovec, S. (2004). Migrant transnationalism and modes of transformation. International Migration Review, 38(3), 970–1001.
Von Lorber, V. (2017). Angeworben. Gastarbeierinnen in Österreich in den 1960er und 1970er Jahren. Göttingen: V&R Unipress.
Weigert, A. (1991). Mixed Emotions: Certain Steps Toward Understanding Ambivalence. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Williams, R. (2009). On structure of feeling. In: Harding, J. and Pribram, E. (eds). Emotions: A Cultural Studies Reader. London; New York: Routledge, 35–49.
Wong, L. (2002). “Home away from home?” Transnationalism and the Canadian citizenship regime. In: Kennedy, P. and Roudometof, V. (eds). Communities across Borders: New Immigrants and Transnational Cultures. London; New York: Routledge, 169–181.
Yeoh, B., Huang, S. (2000). “Home” and “away”: Foreign domestic workers and negotiations of diasporic identity in Singapore. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23(4), 413–429.
Zontini, E. (2015). Growing old in a transnational social field: Belonging, mobility and identity among Italian migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(2), 326–341.
Ссылки
- На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.
(c) 2021 Моника Палмбергер